- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:16:06 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <510FA686.6070000@openlinksw.com>
On 2/4/13 2:25 AM, Vishal Sinha wrote: > Hi, > > I am creating a local RDF store, and storing some information in it > myself. > For example, > - "Angela Merkel is a Chancellor" > - "Barack Obama is a President" > > In DBPedia ontology it is stated that, > Chancellor is subclass of Politician. President is also subclass of > Politician. > > When I make a SPARQL query to my local RDF store, I want to get > inference result according to DBPedia > OWL ontology. > > In this case, if I ask give me all politicians, it should give me - > Angela Merkel and Barack Obama. > > My Question: Should I keep a copy of DBPedia ontology in my RDF store? > Or what else could I do? > > Thanks. > > For inference to work the underlying axioms need to be processed. Thus, you will need to read the DBpedia ontology, one way or the other. Short answer: Yes. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 12:16:29 UTC