- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:13:21 +0100
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Dear Public-LOD, As different Web browsers support different video codecs, with Web video it is not uncommon to see things like the below (simplified for legibility reasons)… <video> <source src="./video.ogv" type="…"> <source src="./video.mp4" type="…"> </video> When I want to make statements about the video in question, I have the problem that the "same" video has two different URIs ([…].mp4, […].ogv). So I have to say ("ma:" from the Ontology for Media Resources [0])… <http://ex.org/video.ogv> a ma:MediaResource . <http://ex.org/video.ogv> ma:title "Sample Video" . <http://ex.org/video.ogv> ma:description "Sample Description" . …and also… <http://ex.org/video.mp4> a ma:MediaResource . <http://ex.org/video.mp4> ma:title "Sample Video" . <http://ex.org/video.mp4> ma:description "Sample Description" . Essentially (unless I wanted to introduce something more complex) I am forced to duplicate all statements I make about both video resources, where actually I would like to make statements about the video no matter its encoding. Long story short, is it too much of a stretch to just say… <http://ex.org/video.mp4> owl:sameAs <http://ex.org/video.ogv> …as to avoid the problem? One issue I see is that, e.g., ma:format (which makes statements about the MIME type) obviously does not hold true for both media resources as their MIME types are different. The implicit (as I read the spec at least) semantics of <video> are that the given alternatives in the various <source>-s should be the "same" video, just in different encodings. What I actually wanted would be something like a canonical URI [1] for a video like <http://ex.org/video>, so that one could make statements based on its canonical URI that would hold true for all representations in different encodings… <http://ex.org/video> a ma:MediaResource . <http://ex.org/video> ma:title "Sample Video" . <http://ex.org/video> ma:description "Sample Description" . …which would hold true for <http://ex.org/video.ogv> and <http://ex.org/video.mp4>. Thanks for your thoughts. Best, Tom -- [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/ [1] https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139394?hl=en -- Thomas Steiner, Employee, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.hTtP5://xKcd.c0m/1181/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 15:14:09 UTC