- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:13:21 +0100
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Dear Public-LOD,
As different Web browsers support different video codecs, with Web
video it is not uncommon to see things like the below (simplified for
legibility reasons)…
<video>
<source src="./video.ogv" type="…">
<source src="./video.mp4" type="…">
</video>
When I want to make statements about the video in question, I have the
problem that the "same" video has two different URIs ([…].mp4,
[…].ogv). So I have to say ("ma:" from the Ontology for Media
Resources [0])…
<http://ex.org/video.ogv> a ma:MediaResource .
<http://ex.org/video.ogv> ma:title "Sample Video" .
<http://ex.org/video.ogv> ma:description "Sample Description" .
…and also…
<http://ex.org/video.mp4> a ma:MediaResource .
<http://ex.org/video.mp4> ma:title "Sample Video" .
<http://ex.org/video.mp4> ma:description "Sample Description" .
Essentially (unless I wanted to introduce something more complex) I am
forced to duplicate all statements I make about both video resources,
where actually I would like to make statements about the video no
matter its encoding.
Long story short, is it too much of a stretch to just say…
<http://ex.org/video.mp4> owl:sameAs <http://ex.org/video.ogv>
…as to avoid the problem? One issue I see is that, e.g., ma:format
(which makes statements about the MIME type) obviously does not hold
true for both media resources as their MIME types are different.
The implicit (as I read the spec at least) semantics of <video> are
that the given alternatives in the various <source>-s should be the
"same" video, just in different encodings. What I actually wanted
would be something like a canonical URI [1] for a video like
<http://ex.org/video>, so that one could make statements based on its
canonical URI that would hold true for all representations in
different encodings…
<http://ex.org/video> a ma:MediaResource .
<http://ex.org/video> ma:title "Sample Video" .
<http://ex.org/video> ma:description "Sample Description" .
…which would hold true for <http://ex.org/video.ogv> and
<http://ex.org/video.mp4>.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Best,
Tom
--
[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/
[1] https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139394?hl=en
--
Thomas Steiner, Employee, Google Inc.
http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.hTtP5://xKcd.c0m/1181/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 15:14:09 UTC