- From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:23:24 +0100
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- CC: Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5213A60C.1000908@ontotext.com>
Thanks, Bernard. I get ~5000 instances of rdf:Property (and 1643 of rdfs:Class - and oddly 5 instances of rdfs:Property), but more than three times as many for: SELECT (COUNT(?property) AS ?properties) { SELECT DISTINCT ?property WHERE{ {?property rdfs:domain ?domain} UNION {?property rdfs:range ?range} UNION {?property rdfs:subPropertyOf ?super} UNION {?sub rdfs:subPropertyOf ?property} } } I'm guessing, therefore, no inference in this store? Since OWL-implied properties would require a much more sophisticated query, is it possible to get the dataset and re-index this with inference? Barry On 20/08/2013 18:02, Bernard Vatant wrote: > Hello Barry > > I had a reminder today that I never answered the question below, and I am very late indeed ! > > Properties and classes of all vocabularies in LOV are aggregated in a triple store > > > of which SPARQL endpoint is athttp://lov.okfn.org/endpoint/lov_aggregator > This is quite "raw data" but you should find everything you need in there. > > > Otherwise can also use the new APIhttp://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/api/v1/vocabs > which for each vocabulary provides the prefix and link to the last version stored. > > > > Hope that helps > > Bernard > > From: Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com <mailto:barry.norton@ontotext.com?Subject=Re%3A%20YASGUI%3A%20Web-based%20SPARQL%20client%20with%20bells%20%FFn%20wistles&In-Reply-To=%3C51D7F122.5060407%40ontotext.com%3E&References=%3C51D7F122.5060407%40ontotext.com%3E>> > Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:27:46 +0100 > > Bernard, does LOV keep a cache of properties and classes? > > I'd really like to see resource auto-completion in Web-based tools like > YASGUI, but a cache is clearly needed for the to be feasible. > > Barry >
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2013 17:23:52 UTC