rel=acl or rel="meta" was: Simple WebID, WebID+TLS Protocol, and ACL Dogfood Demo

On 10 Aug 2013, at 19:33, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:

>>>        > On 8/9/13 8:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>>        >> The protected resource will show you where the acl (meta)
>>>        data is with the header rel="meta"
>>>        > I thought the consensus was: rel="acl"
>>>        >
>>>        > I guess, we are just going to have to support both, to be safe .
> 
> Surely it is early enough in the overall adoption process that *one* can be chosen instead of requiring everyone to support both.  Please do, for the benefit of all future users and implementers.

I have updated the wiki page of WebAccessControl on this here with a 
section on the link relation type:

http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl#rel.3Dacl_or_rel.3Dmeta.3F

Hopfully that will get the right people to join the conversation and
we can then make the decision. Please add which of these your implementation
uses, with pointers to the code.

> 
> David

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 17:47:19 UTC