- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:46:45 +0200
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: mca <mca@amundsen.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org Data" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 10 Aug 2013, at 19:33, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: >>> > On 8/9/13 8:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> >> The protected resource will show you where the acl (meta) >>> data is with the header rel="meta" >>> > I thought the consensus was: rel="acl" >>> > >>> > I guess, we are just going to have to support both, to be safe . > > Surely it is early enough in the overall adoption process that *one* can be chosen instead of requiring everyone to support both. Please do, for the benefit of all future users and implementers. I have updated the wiki page of WebAccessControl on this here with a section on the link relation type: http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl#rel.3Dacl_or_rel.3Dmeta.3F Hopfully that will get the right people to join the conversation and we can then make the decision. Please add which of these your implementation uses, with pointers to the code. > > David Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 17:47:19 UTC