Re: Publication of scientific research

On 4/29/13 3:23 PM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
> On 04/29/2013 09:05 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 4/29/13 1:29 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> ok. Let's see if we can offer xhtml+RDFa as an additional format, and
>>> see how people react. I'll spread the idea a bit.
>>
>> Why stop at xhtml+RDFa when you also have:
>>
>> 1. html+microdata
>> 2. html+turtle -- where you use <script/> for embedding Turtle.
>>
>> Note,  picking winners (overtly or covertly) is always a shortcut to
>> politically induced inertia. It's best to do the complete opposite which
>> has the net effect of demonstrating the innate dexterity of the RDF.
>
> Sure, why not. We can do all of that. Not the challenge.
>
> Will you get the ISWC organizers to accept *HTML*? 

If I had such influence, of course :-)

> That's what I would love to hear.

You heard it now.

> The rest is really details. We can have 20 different machine readable 
> versions of the document if we want. Lets have 1 that's acceptable to 
> get things rolling!

Yes, but why do you think xhtml+rdfa is the one? My point is that we 
don't know "the one", because that shouldn't matter in a world of URIs 
and RDF based Linked Data :-)

>
> -Sarven
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen