- From: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:05:08 +0200
- To: "Marcos, Marta" <Marta.Marcos@tso.co.uk>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHM_hUM-_qyaYxb1Q6sNGOabnmQp3shFGptjsu4+NdZGiZBYaw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Marcos, I suggest you have a look at the SPIN-API that builds on SPARQL + OWL and Jena. I use it a lot for UniProt and is very powerful for validating data to a known schema or rules. It also has build in OWL2-RL reasoner with optional closed world extensions which is really helpfull. http://www.spinrdf.org/ and how we use it at UniProt http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-952/paper_2.pdf Regards, Jerven On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Marcos, Marta <Marta.Marcos@tso.co.uk>wrote: > ** ** > > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > We are now in process to deliver a XML-based information publishing > system, which captures much public information with heavy RDF/RDFa payload. > We wish to create a set of OWL ontologies to model relevant knowledge, and > then we are going to populate the knowledge model by creating different > type of instances based on the ontology schema.**** > > ** ** > > Our goal is to be able to validate the consistency of those new instances > against the knowledge model, in other words, we want to work with > validating instance data in a closed-world scenario. Since we are going to > use **Jena** as our underlying semantic framework, it seems natural to > use ****Jena**** inference OWL capabilities to perform the validation. > Given that we expect to handle some constructs that go beyond the support > of Jena OWL reasoner (such as cardinality restrictions higher than 1 for > object type properties), we are planning to extend ****Jena**** built-ins > to implement our validation rules to deal with this casuistry.**** > > ** ** > > Does anybody have any advice on best practice or any lessons learned from > previous experience when dealing with similar use cases? Any feedback would > be much appreciated.**** > > ** ** > > Marta de Francisco > The Stationery Office **** > > ** ** > > > ********************************************************************** > This email is confidential and may also be privileged and/or proprietary > to The Stationery Office Limited. It may be read, copied and used only by > the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorised use of this email is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact us > immediately and delete it and any copies you have made. Thank you for your > cooperation. > > The Stationery Office Limited is registered in England under Company No. > 3049649 at 1-5 Poland Street, London, W1F 8PR > ********************************************************************** > > > -- Jerven Bolleman me@jerven.eu
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 16:05:36 UTC