- From: Marcos, Marta <Marta.Marcos@tso.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:54:56 +0100
- To: <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A1A6823A4E939D47B121AEEF3EB8EC9B8B8E69@W3EXC017023.theso.co.uk>
Hello, We are now in process to deliver a XML-based information publishing system, which captures much public information with heavy RDF/RDFa payload. We wish to create a set of OWL ontologies to model relevant knowledge, and then we are going to populate the knowledge model by creating different type of instances based on the ontology schema. Our goal is to be able to validate the consistency of those new instances against the knowledge model, in other words, we want to work with validating instance data in a closed-world scenario. Since we are going to use Jena as our underlying semantic framework, it seems natural to use Jena inference OWL capabilities to perform the validation. Given that we expect to handle some constructs that go beyond the support of Jena OWL reasoner (such as cardinality restrictions higher than 1 for object type properties), we are planning to extend Jena built-ins to implement our validation rules to deal with this casuistry. Does anybody have any advice on best practice or any lessons learned from previous experience when dealing with similar use cases? Any feedback would be much appreciated. Marta de Francisco The Stationery Office ********************************************************************** This email is confidential and may also be privileged and/or proprietary to The Stationery Office Limited. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorised use of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact us immediately and delete it and any copies you have made. Thank you for your cooperation. The Stationery Office Limited is registered in England under Company No. 3049649 at 1-5 Poland Street, London, W1F 8PR **********************************************************************
Received on Monday, 29 April 2013 15:58:46 UTC