- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:46:11 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <517979F3.9060007@csarven.ca>
On 04/25/2013 04:57 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > Hi, > > Ok, let's take a practical step. > Let's assume we are going to open a call for a workshop and there we ask > for "structured information". Which steps do we take and what do we need? > > If we want to move one step at a time, we would still need a site to > handle the submission/review process (you cannot rely on online feedback > for accepting/rejecting papers with no bias in a given timeframe). > Something like easychair accepts the upload of extra files, so that > could be used already off the shelf. > > Second, we need to specify where and how Redfin should be used. If we > are in the sw/ld area, what for? We may ask for Uris for: > Citations > Authors > Tools? Ontologies? > > What else ? > > Take for example the papers here: > > http://www.jbiomedsem.com/series/SWAT4LSCSHALS > > What would you propose for this kind o research? It could be practically anything that the authors find worthwhile to have an URI for discovery. In addition to Kingsley's points, here are mine: * Problems, hypothesis, contributions, claims, results, conclusions * If in the form of a blog post, comments, replies, reviews etc. on the page could be invaluable. * Licensing There is also some excellent work done with SPAR (Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies) [1], [2]. [1] http://sempublishing.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sempublishing/SPAR/ [2] http://opencitations.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/introducing-the-semantic-publishing-and-referencing-spar-ontologies/ -Sarven
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2013 18:46:49 UTC