- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:30:50 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 17:31:22 UTC
On 04/24/2013 11:01 AM, Alexander Garcia Castro wrote: > other formats should be accepted, more so in this specific type of > conferences. how is the PDF supporting linked data? as far as I know > part of the problem is precisely that content is locked up in PDF > documents, hardly a case for linked data. > > Last year at sepublica we had a smilar discussion. an ontology was > submitted, no PDF just the ontology. We decided to accept the ontology > as a valid submission. we did request the authors to add some human > readable documentation, but in essence our decision was that the > ontology as such was a valid submission. It is great that you took that approach. That criteria should (?) always be the case. -Sarven
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 17:31:22 UTC