- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:35:51 +0100
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJCyKRqx5DwgpRRZOoZ3YsWZOv3XYRDfKJ0K=1yDdAe8dPJoWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Oh and if you want to see a massive thread on the benefits and upsides to pdf as a format check out: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/beyond-the-pdf/WskBVfAH9Co and as always when talking about pdf one most see Beyond the PDF - The Horror Movie ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jf2PZDmuK4) Paul On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > No offense taken. > > I'm sympathetic as well in terms of encouraging new forms of publication > and in particular encouraging machine readable information. I just don't > think necessarily pdf submissions prevent one from doing all that. > > so I think we are pretty much all on the same page :-) > Paul > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:19 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> >> No offense intended. It certainly isn't your fault that you can't >> modernize the academic publishing industry overnight. Nobody expects that. >> >> However, I do sympathize with Sarven. It won't change if we can't show >> the publishers a more compelling way to do there work. That includes >> economics, not just technology. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >> On Apr 23, 2013, at 17:52, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi >> > >> > As an organizer of both this workshop and one called the Beyond the PDF >> force11.org/beyondthepdf2 - I'll respond. >> > >> > There's nothing particularly wrong with PDF as a means of encapsulating >> human readable information so asking for submissions this way seems >> suitable. (Yes there are downsides to the format and maybe we would should >> be more liberal in terms of formats). pdf also has facilities for embedding >> metadata in rdf. >> > >> > I would hope that the submissions to the workshop are the text around >> lots of links to both source code repositories and linked data sources - >> that's the true test >> > >> > Paul >> > >> > On Apr 23, 2013, at 23:30, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Apr 23, 2013, at 16:11, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 04/23/2013 08:48 PM, Erp, M.G.J. van wrote: >> >>>> Submissions should be formatted according to the Lecture Notes in >> >>>> Computer Science guidelines for proceedings available at >> >>>> http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-7-72376-0 and >> >>>> submitted to https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=lisc2013. >> >>>> Papers should be submitted in PDF format. >> >>> >> >>> Linked Science is brought to you by PDF. >> >> >> >> Yep. That seems silly for a reason :) >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> -Sarven >> >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 22:36:19 UTC