- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:04:30 +0000
- To: Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com>
- CC: "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org>
I may be the only one, but I can't work out with any confidence what JSON your query returns. My first assumption was that it would usually return only "found" or "not found". Can you give me a real example of a Restpark URI with 3 URIs and the JSON returned? You could add this to the web site. Cheers On 16 Apr 2013, at 18:52, Luca Matteis <lmatteis@gmail.com> wrote: > I have recently created Restpark: http://lmatteis.github.io/restpark/ > > It's my way of pushing a standard RESTful interface for accessing RDF data. Still in its very infancy but hopefully it can be something to consider. I personally think the Semantic Web community desperately needs a simpler protocol for querying RDF, along side SPARQL. I have nothing against SPARQL, it's an important standard to have. But something simpler and RESTful needs to be part of the Semantic Web stack. > > The entire web community is used to consuming APIs as simple HTTP requests (REST). Would you imagine GitHub, Flickr, or any other web-service API actually exposing SQL instead of their RESTful API? It would make things a bit more complicated for third-parties in my opinion, but more importantly it would make things so much more complicated for services to implement. > > I would love to think what the community thinks about this. > > Best, > Luca
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2013 20:05:46 UTC