Survey on re-using vocabularies to publish good Linked Open Data - please participate

Dear all,

Is re-using existing vocabularies crucial for modeling "good" Linked Open Data? What do you think?

Please share your thoughts and participate in my survey:

http://freeonlinesurveys.com/s.asp?sid=6rdb8pacxd4n1eg242766



Background: My name is Johann Schaible and I am a research associate at the GESIS Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences in Cologne, Germany. Please support me in the progression of my Ph.D. thesis on the vocabulary recommendation system LOVER.

About the survey: We have designed the survey to study how Linked Open Data publishers and Ontology Engineers consider the good practice of re-using existing vocabularies. The survey will take 15-20 minutes during which you will be asked a few questions and rank a few modeling examples from good to bad modeling. The results of this survey will be published and shared with the community.

Benefits:
- Please help the community to understand the procedure of re-using vocabularies in detail.
- Participate in the survey and get the chance to win one out of three 30€ Amazon voucher.

Last but not least: We do not collect any sensitive personal data. We are serious researchers and all survey participation will be treated anonymously.


Thank you,

Johann




------------------------------------------------------------
Johann Wanja Schaible