Re: Expensive links in Linked Data

Other parts of the charter seem more directly relevant to this thread 
(since they're talking about side-effect, though the REST folks also too 
often also loses focus on actual computation, rather than just moving 
representations around, in my opinion) - Francois-Paul may disagree...

Barry



On 28/09/2012 18:29, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 9/28/12 1:02 PM, Barry Norton wrote:
>> It's worth pointing out that there IS finally a W3C working group 
>> looking at these issues:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter.html
>
> I don't know about this group address the matter of scrollable cursors 
> based on partial query results as enablers of faceted navigation over 
> massive data sets. This matter ultimate includes:
>
> 1. text scores -- partial results including text scores on literal values
> 2. entity ranking -- so partial results that are also entity ranked .
>
> This is a hardcore DBMS issue. LOD2 (EU FP7) more closely aligned to 
> these kinds challenges as exemplified work taking place at the lower 
> DBMS layers based on collaboration between OpenLink and CWI.
>
> Links:
>
> 1. http://lod2.eu/Welcome.html -- about LOD2 project .
>
>
> Kingsley
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "SERVANT Francois-Paul" <francois-paul.servant@renault.com>
>> Date: Fri, Sep 28, 2012 17:54
>> Subject: Expensive links in Linked Data
>> To: "Giovanni Tummarello" <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
>> Cc: "Heiko Paulheim" <paulheim@ke.tu-darmstadt.de>, 
>> "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> may I say that the situation you describe is a bit disappointing? The 
>> unaddressed issues that you mention had already been raised shortly 
>> after the publishing of the "linked data principles", years ago. I 
>> find it is a pity if they remain unanswered, because this can 
>> jeopardize one of the major benefits of RDF and Linked Data: the 
>> ability to publish data that can then easily been read, aggregated 
>> and used in generic ways.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> fps
>>
>>
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : g.tummarello@gmail.com [mailto:g.tummarello@gmail.com]
>>> De la part de Giovanni Tummarello
>>> Envoyé : vendredi 28 septembre 2012 17:13
>>> À : SERVANT Francois-Paul
>>> Cc : Heiko Paulheim; public-lod@w3.org
>>> Objet : Re: Expensive links in Linked Data
>>>
>>> Short answer is no,
>>>
>>> "linked data standards" have never addressed this and many
>>> other even basic problems(e.g. what if there are too many
>>> properties of one kind,  what kind of level of description
>>> you're supposed to get (e.g.
>>> recourse on blank nodes?), what is a standard way to find the
>>> entry URI for an object exposed given a description?  etc etc.
>>>
>>> Just create a normal web API (rest?)  and throttle/meter/bill
>>> as desired using one of the services to do that quickly my2c Gio
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, SERVANT Francois-Paul
>>> <francois-paul.servant@renault.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> no, this doesn't solve the problem. A user gets ex:e0 (the "cheap"
>>>> resource). Though she can see that there is the link to the
>>> "expensive
>>>> resource", she doesn't know the meaning of the link (it is just an
>>>> owl:sameAs): she doesn't know what this is about. (Note also that
>>>> there could be several expensive properties)
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> fps
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>>>> De : Heiko Paulheim [mailto:paulheim@ke.tu-darmstadt.de]
>>>>> Envoyé : vendredi 28 septembre 2012 16:42 À : public-lod@w3.org;
>>>>> SERVANT Francois-Paul Objet : Re: Expensive links in Linked Data
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Francois-Paul,
>>>>>
>>>>> how about that solution:
>>>>>
>>>>> You publish the "cheap" data about your entity under
>>>>> http://example.org/e0, which is the "official" URI of that entity:
>>>>> ex:e0 owl:sameAs ex:e0expensive
>>>>> ex:e0 :cheapProp ...
>>>>>
>>>>> And under http://example.org/ex:e0expensive, you publish
>>>>> ex:e0expensive owl:sameAs ex:e0 ex:e0expensive :expensiveProp ...
>>>>>
>>>>> So people following links in LOD will always land at a
>>> page without
>>>>> the expensive properties, and those who really want to know can
>>>>> follow the sameAs link.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that solve your problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Heiko
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 28.09.2012 16:32, schrieb SERVANT Francois-Paul:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you include links to results of computations in
>>> Linked Data?
>>>>>> For instance, you publish data about entities of a given
>>>>> class. A property, let's call it :expensiveProp, has this class as
>>>>> domain, and you know that computing or publishing the
>>> corresponding
>>>>> triples is expensive. In such a case, you don't want to
>>> produce these
>>>>> triples each time one of your entities is accessed. You want to
>>>>> include in the representation of your entity only a link to that
>>>>> information.
>>>>>> A no-brainer, at first sight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there any recommended ways to proceed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fps
>>>>>> -- Disclaimer ------------------------------------
>>>>>> Ce message ainsi que les eventuelles pieces jointes
>>>>> constituent une correspondance privee et confidentielle a
>>> l'attention
>>>>> exclusive du destinataire designe ci-dessus. Si vous n'etes pas le
>>>>> destinataire du present message ou une personne susceptible de
>>>>> pouvoir le lui delivrer, il vous est signifie que toute
>>> divulgation,
>>>>> distribution ou copie de cette transmission est strictement
>>>>> interdite. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, nous vous
>>>>> remercions d'en informer l'expediteur par telephone ou de lui
>>>>> retourner le present message, puis d'effacer immediatement
>>> ce message
>>>>> de votre systeme.
>>>>>> *** This e-mail and any attachments is a confidential
>>>>> correspondence intended only for use of the individual or entity
>>>>> named above. If you are not the intended recipient or the agent
>>>>> responsible for delivering the message to the intended
>>> recipient, you
>>>>> are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or
>>> copying of
>>>>> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>> received this
>>>>> communication in error, please notify the sender by phone or by
>>>>> replying this message, and then delete this message from
>>> your system.
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Dr. Heiko Paulheim
>>>>> Knowledge Engineering Group
>>>>> Technische Univ
>
>

Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 18:25:46 UTC