- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 11:15:03 -0700
- To: Nicholas Humfrey <njh@aelius.com>
- Cc: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
British Monarchy might be interesting. A while back I went looking for a map of the interconnections amongst European Royalty (obviously a larger problem) and was surprised not to find much. I think eventually I did find some GEDCOM family tree info. https://www.google.com/search?q=european+royalty+family+tree&tbm=isch shows there's interest. If you want to get into species (slippery stuff...), that search also threw up http://blogs.nature.com/news/2008/07/family_tree_shows_dinos_missed.html http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/macro/supertree/index.html "Several years ago, a different 'Bristol team', but including some of the same members, produced the first supertree of dinosaurs, incorporating 277 species, and based on 150 source trees. This served its purpose, and was the largest supertree attempted at that time. However, with 277 species included, this covered only some 50% of dinosaurian diversity." http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/macro/supertree/Supertree.pdf Either way, it'd be great if some kind of interesting network structure existed amongst the entities in your descriptions, to help illustrate that with Linked Data there are often 3 different notions of network all intermingled; e.g. social networks, hypertext networks and semantic networks. cheers, Dan
Received on Sunday, 21 October 2012 18:15:31 UTC