- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:20:59 +0100
- To: rufus.pollock@okfn.org
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 31 May 2012, at 09:02, Rufus Pollock wrote: > You can definitely keep the dataset entry on CKAN there. We don't have > it now but one could introduce a special state of "archived" which > would then mean that the entry was kept but clearly marked as > archived. +1 to a new state for this. Maybe call it “discontinued” or “decommissioned” instead of “archived”? Seems to be more accurate. Richard
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 14:21:34 UTC