- From: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock@okfn.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:04:18 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 31 May 2012 00:12, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > Bradley, > > On 30 May 2012, at 23:03, Bradley Allen wrote: >> I'm regret to say that I'd already nuked the CKAN record by the time this email reached me > > CKAN doesn't actually nuke things that are deleted, it just hides them from view and they can be restored, which I just did for the t4gm dataset: > > http://thedatahub.org/dataset/t4gm-info Exactly - as per my email just now I wonder if we want a state of "archived" separate from "deleted" for this. "Deleted" items can get purged which is not what is wanted here. > Please update the record to reflect the fact that it's now only a “tombstone” for some data that is no longer available. > > We also need some way to mark this for the LOD Cloud. How about adopting a new tag “lodcloud.tombstone”? ;-) rufus
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 08:04:51 UTC