- From: Dominic Oldman <DOLDMAN@thebritishmuseum.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:55:53 +0100
- To: <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F95B72EEAD5E1C48AD94F87D4EFB49E506F66FD8@blmbmbex1.local>
Thanks Antoine. I understand the need to be careful. The email was a bit of a whim at the end of the day. However, I would argue that we are not an isolated node we have simply used ontology has the linking method and we have a very high level of linkage (or harmonisation) with our partners who have used the same mapping system. I guess I could argue a little arrow to and from any CRM implementation without me inserting say some sameas triples (although, of course, I have no problem with this). Indeed our aim to create an environment for exploration across different object types, periods and cultures , not tie it down to pre-configured relationships. Can you tell me the address of the LOD-LAM list? Dominic PS. We should be moving off our very limited Endpoint soon and providing a more robust production Endpoint with fewer limitations in the near future (with images). Dominic Oldman Deputy Head of IS IS Development Manager ResearchSpace Principal Investigator British Museum +44 (0)20 73238796 +44 (0)7980 865309 www.BritishMuseum.org www.ResearchSpace.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 08:56:42 UTC