- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Dominic Oldman <DOLDMAN@thebritishmuseum.ac.uk>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 01:56:05 UTC
+1 (best I can do). FWIW, the day buying your way in ceases to be the certain method of acceptance will be a very good day for all. ________________________________ From: Dominic Oldman <DOLDMAN@thebritishmuseum.ac.uk> To: public-lod@w3.org Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 1:10 PM Subject: Cultural Heritage Data Hugh suggested that I post this. We are currently working with other museums aligning our catalogue data using the CIDOC-CRM ontology. We can now run single federated queries based on semantic alignment without the need to insert specific linking triples. When we applied to advertise our site on the LOD cloud we were turned down because we hadn’t inserted specific links to other data sources. I realise that I could just stuff in a few links to Dbpedia to get accepted - but given that we can harmonise data to a very high degree with another open CRM RDF data source perhaps we should still be allowed formal acceptance to the open data community. Dominic Oldman Deputy Head of IS IS Development Manager ResearchSpace Principal Investigator British Museum +44 (0)20 73238796 +44 (0)7980 865309 www.BritishMuseum.org www.ResearchSpace.org
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 01:56:05 UTC