Re: Introducing the Knowledge Graph: things, not strings

On May 16, 2012, at 17:45, Bernard Vatant wrote:

> Thanks to all who had this ground ploughed and sown patiently since those dark ages where Google was all but an idea.
> Now the grain is ripe and it's a great time for them to harvest ... hope we are left with some crumbs to pick up as a reward of our efforts :)

Hmm, yes.  Will SemWeb researchers feel about Google's Knowledge Graph the way hypertext researchers feel about the Web? I hope not.

Still, Kingsley is right, too.  We are certainly busier than we have ever been, with no clear end in sight.  That's positive.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Bernard
> 
> 2012/5/16 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
> On 5/16/12 4:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Big thumbs up (at least in principle) from google on linked data
> 
> http://googleblog.blogspot.de/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html
> 
> +1000...
> 
> It's getting real interesting. Google and Facebook as massive Linked Data Spaces, awesome!
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen 
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bernard Vatant
> Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> Tel :  + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
> Skype : bernard.vatant
> Linked Open Vocabularies
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Mondeca                             
> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> www.mondeca.com
> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews
>