Re: Predicate for 'related' things based on Wikipedia links?

On 5/14/12 4:28 AM, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes, I was considering that - and then started thinking that I was 
> modelling the wrong thing.
>
> The "has hyperlink to" predicate would apply to documents, not things 
> (although thinking about hyperlinks between real-world places is 
> pretty amazing!).
>
> So I guess it would have to be something more like:
> <http://dbpedialite.org/things/17867> has_hyperlink_to 
> <http://dbpedialite.org/things/6883> .
>
> Rather than:
> <http://dbpedialite.org/things/17867#id> has_hyperlink_to 
> <http://dbpedialite.org/things/6883#id> .
>
> So maybe that is what I will do.

Nick,

The SIOC ontology has offered a "links_to" property since inception :-)

Links:

1. http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/#term_links_to  -- the description is a 
little dated since SIOC isn't solely about online forums .

Kingsley
>
> nick.
>
>
> On 14/05/2012 08:14, "Richard Light" <richard@light.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >    Nicholas,
> >
> >  My immediate reaction is that it would make more sense to be more 
> specific
> > about the nature of your links.  There is clearly a significant 
> difference
> > between "related to" and "not related to", and it wouldn't be wise to 
> conflate
> > them by using the same predicate.
> >
> >  Why not just invent a "has hyperlink to" predicate, since that's the 
> reality
> > of the situation?
> >
> >  Richard
> >
> >  On 12/05/2012 14:50, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am looking at making some enhancements to dbpedialite.org.
> >>
> >> One of the things I plan to add is a list of things linked to from a
> >> Wikipedia article. This could be useful for machine learning.
> >>
> >> For example for London:
> >> Metropolitan area
> >> River Thames
> >> History of London
> >> Roman Empire
> >> City of London
> >> City Hall
> >> ...
> >>
> >> 'similar to' or 'related to' are too strong. There may be links on 
> the page
> >> to say that one thing is definitely not related to another.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any suggestions on the predicate that I should use? 
> Should
> >> I just make one up? Should I create it in OpenVocab?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> nick.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/
> >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
> personal
> >> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
> >> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> >> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
> reliance
> >> on it and notify the sender immediately.
> >> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> >> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> nick.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain 
> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically 
> stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in 
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this. 


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen