- From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 12:42:17 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1336160537.61677.YahooMailNeo@web112609.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
My guess would be that a database view would look ... wait for it ... like a database view :o) The D2R server has a RDB back end. you can run queries directly (or make them views or stored procedures). For example[1]. MeSH is a controlled vocabulary (Medical Subject Headings), and they offer the same sort of tree[2]. Mine is linked to the LOC ID Servers. It could just as easily be linked to dbpedia resources. [1] http://www.rustprivacy.org/2012/urn-lex/united.states.outline.xhtml [2] http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/filelist.html ________________________________ From: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com> To: public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org> Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 3:12 AM Subject: Layered Data Hi, I've written up some thoughts on considering datasets as "layers" that can be combined to create useful aggregations. The concept originated with Dan Brickley and I see the RDF WG are considering the term as an alternative to "named graph". My own usage is more general. I thought I'd share a link here to see what people thought. The paper is at: http://ldodds.com/papers/layered-data.html And a blog post with some commentary here: http://www.ldodds.com/blog/2012/05/layered-data-a-paper-some-commentary/ Cheers, L.
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 19:48:46 UTC