On 2012-03 -27, at 16:17, Michael Smethurst wrote: > No sane publisher trying to handle a decent amount of traffic is gonna > follow the dbpedia pattern of doing it in one step (conneg to 303) and > picking up 2 server hits per request. I've said here before that the dbpedia > publishing pattern is an anti-pattern and shouldn't be encouraged So see the alternative suggestion to use 200 with a header to mean "I am using the other semantics, you asked for a thing and here is a representation of a document describing it - and BTW the document has this URI if you want to talk about it. http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/ChangeProposal25 Tim
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 22:22:23 UTC