- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:57:31 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F70E64B.8070801@openlinksw.com>
On 3/26/12 5:21 PM, Nuno Bettencourt wrote: > Well, I guess all the work I've been doing, in order to automatically > create traceability annotations for user-generated-content upon > resources to support resource recommendation of access control is > going down the drain. Of course not. > At least I was using WebIDs, all the traceability annotations could be > stored in LOD repositories and actions could be traced back to the > user by using open standards. Good! > > Will this still happen with Google or Facebook? Already happening on the Facebook side, so Google will eventually follow. > I guess they already track down everything one does. The difference is > that they don't publish it but at least they could give access to the > user who "generated" that information. You would think! > > Nevertheless, I still want to be able to keep my records of where I > browsed, how I browsed, how many scrolls I did on one page, which > resources I have uploaded (independently of each website), downloaded, > etc. I want to be able to share those resources according to my rules > and not by those imposed by local webserver policies and have > cross-domain sharing policies so that I can manage my sharing with > friends/others in a single/distributed place and not replicated and > translated to each website data silo... Yep! Thus, WebID and ACLs based on Web == Your Best Friend. > > For these reasons I think there's still going to be space for > envisioned academic uses of semantic web. > > Facebook and/or Google using WebIDs and linked data in the future? > Would help in lots of aspects ;) They all end up in the right place post effects of opportunity cost. Preaching to behemoths is a waste of time, eating their lunch is a productive and ultimately rewarding pastime at the very least :-) Kingsley > Best regards, > Nuno Bettencourt > > > On 26/03/2012, at 20:53, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote: > >> See: >> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304459804577281842851136290.html >> >> The clock is ticking now and it seems Google will soon take over >> semantic web technologies, or not? >> >> With the new privacy universal agreement introduced at the beginning >> of March this year by Google it was only logical that semantic search >> would be added to expand the data mining tool kit to optimize the >> utilization of user generated trails of web use. >> >> And what will happen to the envisioned academic uses of semantic web >> technologies and linked data? >> >> Are we facing a world according to Google (and FaceBook etc.)? >> >> Milton Ponson >> GSM: +297 747 8280 >> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad >> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean >> Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for >> sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide by creating ICT >> tools for NGOs worldwide and: providing online access to web sites >> and repositories of data and information for sustainable development >> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify >> the system manager. This message contains confidential information >> and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the >> named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this >> e-mail. > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 21:57:54 UTC