- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:08:29 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 11:08:58 UTC
On 3/26/12 3:57 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On 25/03/12 19:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> Tim, >> >> Alternatively, why not use the existing "Link:" header? Then we end up >> with the ability to express the same :describedby relation in three >> places > > Which is, of course, in the now-submitted proposal. > > Dave > Yes, and I only found that out yesterday as you'll see from my thread with Jonathan :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 11:08:58 UTC