- From: トーレ エリクソン <tore.eriksson@po.rd.taisho.co.jp>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:38:36 +0900
- To: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Giovanni, > So the proposal is to forget immediately the whole distinction and > anything else than a simple 200: > > * Only return 200, > * As a default, clients known that they're dealing with Non IR > * if you really have to annotate some IR for very low lever purposes > then you do it anyway with proper attributes/ontologies .. which > clients will know and act accordingly. This is the essence of my proposal[1], with the possibility to follow Link: headers etc added. However, any proposal deprecating IRs will probably be very short-lived, so don't get your hopes up. Tore [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Mar/0085.html _______________________________________________________________ Tore Eriksson [tore.eriksson at po.rd.taisho.co.jp]
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 08:39:13 UTC