- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:35:44 +0000
- To: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>, Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>, Dave Reynolds <dave@epimorphics.com>, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
On 23 Mar 2012, at 14:05, Jonathan A Rees wrote: > 2012/3/23 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>: >> I dont think, even the wildest optimist, could have predicted the success of >> the current architecture (both pre and post HR14). > > The votes of confidence are interesting to me, as I have not been > hearing them previously. It does appear we have a divided community, > with some voices feeling that 303 will be the death of linked data, > and others saying hash and 303 are working well. Where the center of > gravity lies, I have no way of telling (and perhaps it's not important > as long as any disagreement, or even ignorance, remains). As Larry > Masinter said at the last TAG telcon, things do not seem to be > converging. I'm sure many people are just deeply bored of this discussion. It's probably important, but I'm beginning to suspect that there isn't actually a "right" answer. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England NG80 1ZZ
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 15:35:57 UTC