- From: Hans Cools <hcools@telenet.be>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:47:29 +0200
- To: Leyla Jael García Castro <leyla.jael.garcia@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-Id: <990FFF57-5BE4-4A2D-9E0F-96EC3ACB9F56@telenet.be>
Hi Leyla, Please have a look at following ontologies: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/informationrealization.owl Declaring e.g. informationRealization:InformationRealization http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl It depends on the abovementioned ontology. Declaring e.g. irw:InformationResource http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/document# It depends on the abovementioned ontologies. Declaring e.g. doc:Content rdfs:subClassOf irw:InformationResource. Cheers, Hans On 03 Jul 2012, at 11:24, Leyla Jael García Castro wrote: > Hi all, > > I am modelling the structure and content of document. I am using DoCO (http://purl.org/spar/doco) for the structure, i.e. Section, Paragraph, etc. > Now I need to model the actual content in a paragraph, meaning the text in it. Here an example: > > <myDocumentURI> pattern:contains [ a doco:Section > ; pattern:contains [ a doco:Paragraph > ; -content property- "This is the text in the paragraph." ] ] . > > What would be the best approach to do that? bibo:content (http://bibliontology.com/) is deprecated so I do not want to use that one; the recommendation there is to use rdf:value, that would be an alternative. sioc:content is another alternative. It could also be c4o:hasContent (http://purl.org/spar/c4o). I guess there are also other alternatives out there. > > Which one would be the best alternative? Any suggestions? > > Thanks so much, > > lj
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 09:47:53 UTC