- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 06:58:44 +0100
- To: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Frans Knibbe | Geodan" <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, public-lod@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 06:00:29 UTC
John, the WG mail archives are at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/ Unfortunately, the various threads are a bit mixed but, usually, threads which may include the word [GRAPH], 'dataset semantics', 'graph and documents', and similars, are around this issue. Ivan On Jan 4, 2012, at 18:40 , John Erickson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ivan <ivan@w3.org> wrote in reply to Frans: >> It is a simple question. The answer isn't: the RDF WG is currently trying to find a consensus on that since its inspection. There are about 4-500 mails on that subject in the WG's archive:-) > > Ivan, could you provide a link to the relevant thread in the RDF WG's > archive? It wasn't immediately clear from the Open Issues > <http://bit.ly/zWeejB> > > -- > John S. Erickson, Ph.D. > Director, Web Science Operations > Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) > <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> > Twitter & Skype: olyerickson ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 06:00:29 UTC