- From: Yrjana Rankka <ghard@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:54:15 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 1/4/12 17:42 , Yrjana Rankka wrote: > On 1/4/12 17:00 , Kingsley Idehen wrote: >>> >> >> Trouble is that there isn't consensus re. this matter. >> >> For instance, one could assume that the URI / IRI of a named graph >> resolves to a description of said graph. That wouldn't really imply >> all the triples in the named graph :-) > > Let's consider this situation: > > GRAPH <x> > <s1> <p1> "val1"; > <p2> "val2"; > <p3> "val3". > > GRAPH <metadata> > <x> dc:created "somedate"; > dc:modified "someotherdate"; > dc:creator "Zaphod Beeblebrox". > > A client dereferences <x> > > What would you expect to get? > > Cheers, > Oops. This was directed towards Frans, not Kingsley ;) -- Mr. Yrjana Rankka | ghard@openlinksw.com Developer, Virtuoso Team | http://www.openlinksw.com | Making Technology Work For You
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 15:55:26 UTC