- From: Yrjana Rankka <ghard@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:54:15 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 1/4/12 17:42 , Yrjana Rankka wrote:
> On 1/4/12 17:00 , Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Trouble is that there isn't consensus re. this matter.
>>
>> For instance, one could assume that the URI / IRI of a named graph
>> resolves to a description of said graph. That wouldn't really imply
>> all the triples in the named graph :-)
>
> Let's consider this situation:
>
> GRAPH <x>
> <s1> <p1> "val1";
> <p2> "val2";
> <p3> "val3".
>
> GRAPH <metadata>
> <x> dc:created "somedate";
> dc:modified "someotherdate";
> dc:creator "Zaphod Beeblebrox".
>
> A client dereferences <x>
>
> What would you expect to get?
>
> Cheers,
>
Oops. This was directed towards Frans, not Kingsley ;)
--
Mr. Yrjana Rankka | ghard@openlinksw.com
Developer, Virtuoso Team | http://www.openlinksw.com
| Making Technology Work For You
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 15:55:26 UTC