- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:51:29 -0500
- To: carsten.kessler@uni-muenster.de
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org, Chad Hendrix <hendrix@un.org>
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 13:20 +0100, Carsten Keßler wrote: [ . . . ] > > In principle, SPARQL 1.1 allows you to specify any number of named > > graphs to be used in a query, using the "FROM NAMED" syntax. However, > > this is not likely to work well when the number of named graphs gets > > large. > > What exactly do you mean by "not likely to work well"? Is there any > evidence that this is really the case? I do not have any specific evidence. I simply meant that SPARQL server developers probably did not have thousands of "FROM NAMED" clauses in mind as their primary design target, so you could run into unforeseen difficulties. If some SPARQL servers do handle this well, or if someone has made such measurements, it would be great to hear about them. -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 15:36:28 UTC