- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:26:35 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F46307B.1030409@openlinksw.com>
On 2/23/12 7:07 AM, Carsten Keßler wrote: > Dear Kingsley, > >>> But this is what (most?) triple stores do with the default graph in the >>> absence of FROM/NAMED clauses in queries anyway. (Certainly this is the >>> Sesame approach, followed by OWLIM.) >> Not so re. Virtuoso. The Graph IRIs don't matter. Only used them if you >> explicitly seek to constrain the dataset from which you seek a SPARQL based >> solution. > This is the behavior we want to have. In most cases, we'll have > queries that select the named graphs to query from via their metadata. > E.g. "give me all reports about food distributions reported on > 2011-12-15 by organization XY", where the reporting data and reporting > organization would be metadata of our named graphs. > >> Same data across different Graph IRIs != duplication. > This was essentially one of my questions. Is this the case only for Virtuoso? > > Carsten > > I would hope this is the case for any quad store . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 12:27:02 UTC