- From: Ben O'Steen <bosteen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:18:42 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+zvE8jSbtOWN9t5mkjjei6e-BTuann_VOMhf_M6egZ6eiodag@mail.gmail.com>
A quick related question - does anyone know the status of "purl.oclc.org" - there was a point in time where the service suggested that this new hostname was going to be the new proper host for purl.org urls. I hope they have abandoned this idea, as one sure way to affect url longevity is to include a organisational brand in it ;) Ben On Feb 18, 2012 1:02 PM, "Dave Reynolds" <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17/02/12 21:08, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> On 2/17/12 2:18 PM, David Booth wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 18:48 +0000, Hugh Glaser wrote: >>> [ . . . ] >>> >>>> What happens if I have http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo, which is set to >>>> go to http://dbpedia.org/resource/**Tokyo<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tokyo> >>>> ? >>>> I have (a), (b) and (c) as before. >>>> Now if dbpedia.org goes Phut!, we are in exactly the same situation - >>>> (b) gets lost. >>>> >>> No, the idea is that the administrator for http://purl.org/dbpedia/ >>> updates the redirect, to point to whatever new site is hosting the >>> dbpedia data, so the http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo still works. >>> >>> >>> >>> David, >> >> But any admin that oversees a DNS server can do the same thing. What's >> special about purl in this context? >> > > Precisely that they don't require an admin with power over the DNS > registration :) > > To me the PURL design pattern is about delegation authority and it's an > important pattern. > > Two specific use cases at different extremes: > > (1) An individual is creating a small vocabulary that they would like to > see used widely but don't have a nice brand-neutral stable domain of their > own they can use for the purpose. This one has already been covered in the > discussion. > > (2) I'm a big organization, say the UK Government. I want to use a > particular domain (well a set of subdomains) for publishing my data, say *. > data.gov.uk. The domain choice is important - it has credibility and > promises long term stability. Yet I want to decentralize the publication > itself, I want different departments and agencies to publish data and > identifiers within the subdomains. The subdomains are supposed to be > organization-neural yet the people doing the publication will be based in > specific organizations. The PURL design pattern (though not necessarily the > specific PURL implementation) is an excellent way to manage the delegation > that makes that possible. > > So my summary answer to Hugh is - they are much more important to the > publisher than to the consumer. > > Dave > >
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 14:19:11 UTC