W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > February 2012

Re: PURLs don't matter, at least in the LOD world

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:04:22 -0500
Message-ID: <4F3EC0D6.4040307@openlinksw.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org
On 2/17/12 1:48 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
> (Sorry if there is a paper/discussion on this that I have missed somewhere. And I may have some of this wrong, as I have essentially not used PURLs.)
> M Scott Marshall and others' comments have prompted me to put pen to paper and ask what the list thinks on this.
> It has long puzzled me why people seem to think that PURLs (and Handles, etc.) solve some actual problem.
> Leaving aside the question of whether it actually adds extra fragility as to whether purl.org will continue to exist.
> (Personally I would bet the Library of Congress will last longer than purl.org, but I would have to wait too long to collect on the bet to make it worthwhile.)
> In the Linked Data world, at least, what does a PURL give protection from?
> Let's say I have http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tokyo. I can:
> a) Use the URI without any URI resolution at all, and it is really useful to do so (as commented, foaf:name is used a lot, and it does not depend on anything being at the other end to resolve to);
> b) I can resolve to find out what DBPedia thinks it "means" (returns as RDF);
> c) I can use it as an ID for another source to find out what that other source thinks it "means".
> Now let's say dbpedia.org goes Phut!
> What I lose is facility (b)
> What happens if I have http://purl.org/dbpedia/Tokyo, which is set to go to http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tokyo?
> I have (a), (b) and (c) as before.
> Now if dbpedia.org goes Phut!, we are in exactly the same situation - (b) gets lost.
> Both of these situation can be fixed by persuading someone (the registrar for dbpedia.org or the purl.org organisers respectively) to allow someone else to take over purl.org/dbpedia or dbpedia.org respectively.
> But once dbpedia.org goes Phut!, you get a dead link whatever you do, until someone takes it over.
> Not much to be gained for the overheads of having the purl?
> I can see that in the Web of Text, a URI that has gone 404 is rather painful.
> And I know that people who have curated data find dying links painful, and seem to find Handles etc some sort of comfort for their concerns, even though they don't necessarily solve the perceived problem, in my view.
> But in the Web of Data, given a good guess at somewhere else (such as the LoC, or even the Virtuoso endpoint or sameAs.org), I stand a good chance of finding a skos:*Match or even an owl:sameAs that will get me back on track again.
> Is there something I am missing about PURLs?
> Best
> Hugh


Nice value proposition articulation re. Web of Linked Data :-)



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 21:04:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:57 UTC