- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:18:58 +0000
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 24/12/12 14:38, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 12/23/12 8:48 PM, David Wood wrote: >> On Dec 22, 2012, at 17:23, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/22/12 11:25 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>>> >>>> So I think anyone register this, if there's interest, it would >>>> probably just need to reopen the conversation with the sparql wg >>>> mail list, I think. >>> I suggest, you just do it :-) >> >> Normally, I'd agree, but in this case I think the SPARQL WG thread is >> worth reading; they have a good point. > > Help me with a link to the specific point. I've taken a quick look and > haven't found anything that changes my position re. "just do it". > > Discoverability remains something that's received too little attention > re. Linked Data, SPARQL, and RDF. It isn't something best handled (a as > prescription) by the W3C (IMHO). When best practices have been > established, the W3C can come in and formalize etc.. void descriptions and service descriptions provide searchable documents? At least they provide an answer to what to put at a well-known URI. > We need to bootstrap first, and the formalize standardization later. The > alternative route never works, as you can see from the age of the > initial suggestion re. this matter :-) A good argument ... for using sitemapsˇ Andy > > > Happy Holidays to you and everyone else on the list ! > >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Kingsley Idehen >>> Founder & CEO >>> OpenLink Software >>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >>> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >>> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen >>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about >>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 24 December 2012 16:19:29 UTC