Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 14:33 +0100, Phil Archer wrote:
> [ . . . ] The actual URI for it is 
> (or rather, that's the page about the spec but that's a side issue for 
> now).
> That URI is just horrible and certainly not a 'cool URI'. The Eurostat 
> one is no better.
> Does the datatype URI have to resolve to anything (in theory no, but in 
> practice? Would a URN be appropriate?

It's helpful to be able to click on the URI to figure out what exactly
was meant.  How about just using a URI shortener, such as or

David Booth, Ph.D.

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.

Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 14:39:20 UTC