- From: Paul Wilton <pwilton@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:00:58 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Cc: Jarred.McGinnis@pressassociation.com
- Message-ID: <CALer3uZ+9Z_iDA-WEE9TCwTHjMrtnnZpxs1eCLe9XszyvVXmVw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Steph There is clearly some crossover with rNews. Jarred has a nice diagram showing some of this, and I am sure he will follow up. However we feel with press.net we have gone much further than rNews particularly in acknowledging that news (in the majority of cases) is event driven. While rNews provides the abilty to mark up documents with meta tag associations to things in the real world, in many cases annotating directly like this does not in fact reflect the nature of news. In fact the news article in a large majority of cases should be annotated with the Event that story is about. It is the Event that then has the location, agents, factors, and date/time associated with it. Many news stories thus would be authored about the same event. We have provided a framework for this model, and also a lightweight model (framework) of the relationships between the stuff that news is about. So while rNews will undoubtedly have an impact on search and SEO, there are use-cases where it falls short. The press.net ontologies we have built we feel reflect the true nature of news, and lets consumers of news RDF repesented with this model (or APIs built around this model) to make rich and accurate aggregations of news content, distinguishing between content that is say genuinely about a Location (eg about its cultural heritage maybe), and news that is about an event that occurred in that location (eg a murder). best regards Paul Wilton
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 12:31:21 UTC