- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:19:35 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EA09E77.6050801@openlinksw.com>
On 10/20/11 5:31 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > What's more I really don't think the issues is about not understanding > about the distinction (at least in the clear cut cases). Most people I > talk to grok the distinction, the hard bit is understanding why 303 > redirects is a sensible way of making it and caring about it enough to > put those in place. What about separating the concept of "indirection" from its actual mechanics? Thus, conversations about benefits will then have the freedom to blossom. Here's a short list of immediately obvious benefits re. Linked Data (at any scale): 1. access to data via data source names -- millions of developers world wide already do this with ODBC, JDBC, ADO.NET, OLE DB etc.. the only issue is that they are confined to relational database access and all its shortcomings 2. integration of heterogeneous data sources -- the ability to coherently source and merge disparately shaped data culled from a myriad of data sources (e.g. blogs, wikis, calendars, social media spaces and networks, and anything else that's accessible by name or address reference on a network) 3. crawling and indexing across heterogeneous data sources -- where the end product is persistence to a graph model database or store that supports declarative query language access via SPARQL (or even better a combination of SPARQL and SQL) 4. etc... Why is all of this important? Data access, integration, and management has been a problem that's straddled every stage of computer industry evolution. Managers and end-users always think about data conceptually, but continue to be forced to deal with access, integration, and management in application logic oriented ways. In a nutshell, applications have been silo vectors forever, and in doing so they stunt the true potential of computing which (IMHO) is ultimately about our collective quests for improved productivity. No matter what we do, there are only 24 hrs in a day. Most humans taper out at 5-6 hrs before physiological system faults kick in, hence our implicit dependency of computers for handling voluminous and repetitive tasks. Are we there yet? Much closer that most imagine. Our biggest hurdle (as a community of Linked Data oriented professionals) is a protracted struggle re. separating concepts from implementation details. We burn too much time fighting implementation details oriented battles at the expense of grasping core concepts. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 22:22:13 UTC