- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:33:52 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EA00720.9090205@openlinksw.com>
On 10/20/11 5:34 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote: > > > On 20/10/2011 01:18, "Nathan"<nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > >> Dave Reynolds wrote: >>> The problem, as I see it, is that developers start from the NIR but then >>> use web browsers to find their way round the data and then cut paste the >>> browser locations they find, thus ending up with IRs where they should >>> have had NIRs. >> Agree, you put that very nicely Dave. >> >> Perhaps Michael nailed it when he mentioned separation of concerns, one >> could suggest that this is what happens when the data-tier has knowledge >> of the presentation-tier (i.e. punting the user to a view of the data, >> rather than the data directly). That itself is quite possibly the >> product of using a web browser as a data browser. >> >> I think it's fair to say that nothing is going to clean up the mess, so >> perhaps it's just a case of looking at tooling to sanity check our data. >> >> Hugh's javascript would make a fine bookmarklet, click it and it changes >> the URI in the "address bar" to the NIR URI rather than the IR URI >> (assuming a 1-1 relation that is). > <semi-serious-suggestion> > > Whilst I'm failing to lurk as well as: > <link rel="alernate" href="/programmes/:programme.rdf"/> > > is there room for: > <link rel="ting" href="/programmes/:programme#programme"/> Of course, <link/> is really another way of expressing a relation . Here's an excerpt from one of my profile pages: <link rel="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic" title="About" href="http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this" /> > to expose the nir uri? Maybe with a bookmarklet / greasemonkey style script > to pull out the nir uri and display it to anyone interested. Maybe even > using replaceState on the address bar :-) Fine, that's one of the benefits of Web Linking patterns [1]. Link: 1. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988 -- Web Linking Kingsley > Maybe this already exists > </semi-serious-suggestion> >> Further, surely it must be possible to create a tool which quickly >> sanity checked triples, almost like a semantic web version of Google's >> "did you mean?" >> >> If you write: >> >> fbase:Italy owl:sameAs<http://dbpedia.org/page/Italy> . >> >> Then any number of checks could be made, for example that the class of >> Country is distinct from the class of Document, perhaps even hooking in >> on the primaryTopic relation. >> >> It's clear after all these years that people will publish data however >> they want, guidance will be ignored, and that humans make mistakes - so >> perhaps we should be relying on machine understanding of our data, to >> correct our very human mistakes. Wherever possible that is :) >> >> Best, >> >> Nathan > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/ > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 11:34:19 UTC