- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:10:24 -0400
- To: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com> wrote: > Hi Jonathan > > I think what I'm interested in is what problems might surface and > approaches for mitigating them. I'm sorry, the writeup was designed to do exactly that. In the example in the "conflict" section, a miscommunication (unsurfaced disagreement) leads to copyright infringement. Isn't that a problem? There is no heuristic that will tell you which of the two works is licensed in the stated way, since both interpretations are perfectly meaningful and useful. For mitigation in this case you only have a few options 1. precoordinate (via a "disambiguating" rule of some kind, any kind) 2. avoid using the URI inside <...> altogether - come up with distinct wads of RDF for the 2 documents 3. say locally what you think <...> means, effectively treating these URIs as blank nodes Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 22:10:47 UTC