- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:41:51 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4E9D821F.5070905@openlinksw.com>
On 10/18/11 7:54 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > Can someone remind me why people are using 303 at all, as opposed to > hash URIs in the #_ or #it pattern? > > I've been trying to make a compelling case for 303 over hash, without > much success. > > What would be most valuable is war stories, especially ones that > answer questions that have been left unanswered in the previous thread > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0003.html and in > the writeup http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/issue57/latest/#hash > > Thanks > Jonathan > > I think that had a lot to do with IE and the desire to boostrap Linked Data in a manner that worked across all browsers. Links: 1. http://jamespreston.co.uk/Articles/RedirectingIE6ToUrlWithFragmentIdentifier.html -- here is a 2007 post about the problem -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 13:42:27 UTC