- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:45:13 +0100
- To: Keith Alexander <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Keith, Could you please add a few words about SchemaCache on this wiki page: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Ontology_Dowsing#Repositories Thanks and regards, AZ. Le 14/03/2011 14:18, Keith Alexander a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Martin Hepp > <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: >> Hi Dieter: >> >> There are several ontology repositories available on-line, but to my knowledge they all suffer from two serious limitations: >> >> 1. They do not rate ontologies by quality/relevance/popularity, so you do not get any hint whether foaf:Organization or foo:Organization will be the best way to expose your data. > > Schemacache[1] used to order results by the number of documents > Sindice found it it, but this wasn't terribly effective; what we want > is something more like "number of individual publishers using term X" > rather than "number of individual documents using term X". > > I could work this out without too much difficulty from the VoID > descriptions published by CKAN[2] if more dataset descriptions listed > void:exampleResources (around half of them don't), and if more VoID > dataset descriptions specified the dct:publisher and dct:creator of > the dataset, this would also be useful. > > >> 2. The selection of ontologies listed is, to say the best, often biased or partly a random choice. I do not know any repository that >> - has a broad coverage, >> - includes the top 25 linked data ontologies and >> - lists more non-toy ontologies than abandoned PhD project prototypes. >> >> >> The most useful tool for your purpose is likely >> >> http://prefix.cc/popular/all >> > > Schemacache used to be rather polluted with abandoned and toy > ontologies, but in November last year I started afresh with only the > namespaces registered on http://prefix.cc > The search results are now much more likely to be useful, though there > is still the odd bit of junk in there, and there is certainly room for > improvement. > > > [1] http://schemacache.com > [2] http://semantic.ckan.net/sparql > -- Antoine Zimmermann Researcher at: Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information Database Group 7 Avenue Jean Capelle 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France Lecturer at: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon 20 Avenue Albert Einstein 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 14:47:58 UTC