- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:38:01 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 19 Jun 2011, at 12:45, Dave Reynolds wrote: > Hi Hugh, > >> By the way, as is well-known I think, a lot of people use and therefore must be happy with URIs that are not Range-14 compliant, such as http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema . > > Your general point that there is non-compliant data out there that > people are still able to make use of is probably right, but that > specific example is compliant - those are all (even the ontology URI) > hash-URIs. I know, I know - as I pressed the send button I thought uh-uh :-) Sorry. Mind you, I deliberately left the # off the URI and I think I got confused about ... Oh never mind - sorry. > > Dave > > -- Hugh Glaser, Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ Work: +44 23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 23 8059 3045 Mobile: +44 75 9533 4155 , Home: +44 23 8061 5652 http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~hg/
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 13:39:08 UTC