- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:38:01 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 19 Jun 2011, at 12:45, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Hi Hugh,
>
>> By the way, as is well-known I think, a lot of people use and therefore must be happy with URIs that are not Range-14 compliant, such as http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema .
>
> Your general point that there is non-compliant data out there that
> people are still able to make use of is probably right, but that
> specific example is compliant - those are all (even the ontology URI)
> hash-URIs.
I know, I know - as I pressed the send button I thought uh-uh :-)
Sorry.
Mind you, I deliberately left the # off the URI and I think I got confused about ...
Oh never mind - sorry.
>
> Dave
>
>
--
Hugh Glaser,
Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia
School of Electronics and Computer Science,
University of Southampton,
Southampton SO17 1BJ
Work: +44 23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 23 8059 3045
Mobile: +44 75 9533 4155 , Home: +44 23 8061 5652
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~hg/
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 13:39:08 UTC