W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2011

Re: HTTP 302

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:12:50 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=9iB0ZbqCz_=TRt=YDRMEAtoXPpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-lod@w3.org
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
>
>> One last comment, it's a shame we use a code meaning "See Other"
>>
>> You could get a lot of useful mileage out of a 3XX code meaning "Is
>> Described By"
>>
>>
> and what if you got two of those 3XX's chained, what would be being
> described?
>
> -> GET /A
> -< 30X /B
> -> GET /B
> -< 30X /C
> -> GET /C
> -< 200 OK
>
> does /C describe /A or /B ?
>

/B (assuming 30X = 303)
Can you offer an interpretation otherwise?


>
> 303 is a nice loose way of saying "/x may give you more information",
> stressing the "may" in that sentence, as it equally may not.
>
>
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 21:13:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:29:54 UTC