Re: Using Facebook Data Objects to illuminate Linked Data add-on re. structured data

Hi Kingsley,

I have a few questions. See below.

On 14 Jun 2011, at 22:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 6/13/11 9:29 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> 
>> Then you go on to say that it would be much better if it said:
>> 
>>    "id": "https://www.facebook.com/kidehen#this" 
> 
> For the record, after scratching my head a few times following responses from both Richard and Glenn re. item above, I now see that really meant to have posted:
> 
> https://graph.facebook.com/kidehen#this

Would you agree that Facebook are the owners of this URI?

Would you agree that the owner of a URI gets to decide what it identifies?

Would you agree that a good URI is one where the URI owner has explicitly communicated (ideally through its representations) what it identifies?

If I wanted to state, using Facebook URIs, that I know you, would you expect me to do this:

    <http://graph.facebook.com/richard.cyganiak#this>
        foaf:knows <http://graph.facebook.com/kidehen#this>.

or this:

    <http://graph.facebook.com/richard.cyganiak>
        foaf:knows <http://graph.facebook.com/kidehen>.

?

Thanks,
Richard



> 
> And yes, that's owl:sameAs:
> 
> https://graph.facebook.com/605980750#this .
> 
> Re. this whole matter of Names and Address ambiguity relative to usefulness, Facebook doesn't really grok the above, neither does it grok fact that:
> 
> <https://graph.facebook.com/130118787030077#this> owl:sameAs <https://www.facebook.com/kidehen#this>, <https://graph.facebook.com/605980750#this> .
> 
> Instead of burning cycles getting them to think along the lines above, best I get something made that takes advantage of this insight for the time being :-)
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> President&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 10:36:18 UTC