- From: Brian Peterson <publicayers@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:26:34 -0400
- To: "'Linked Data community'" <public-lod@w3.org>
Personally, I find Microdata more complex that RDFa, but only after understanding RDFa well enough to know how to make it simple. But Microdata is crummy, crummy at doing what it does (not to mention what it cannot do). It perverts HTML attributes my making one value-less and making order of attributes significant. Why would Google, Bing, and Yahoo! choose Microdata rather than doing what Facebook did and use a simpler RDFa? Brian -----Original Message----- From: public-lod-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hausenblas Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 5:06 PM To: Linked Data community Subject: Schema.org in RDF ... http://schema.rdfs.org ... is now available - we're sorry for the delay ;) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 21:27:20 UTC