Re: AW: Ontology license info

Hi Raul,

1) Could you send me a link to the current ontology - the one I found
doesn't have the reference to CC.
2) I'm guessing that the cc properties are defined (as with the rest) in the
http://omv.ontoware.org/2005/05/ontology namespace. This would mean that
there would be an integration problem if someone cited a CC license -
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

What not use the published IRIs?

0Alan

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Raul Palma <rpalma@man.poznan.pl> wrote:

> Hi all,****
>
> To complement what Mari Carmen said, in OMV there is class LicenseModel
> that it is used to specify the license of a particular Ontology (via the
> hasLicense objectProperty).****
>
> OMV definition:****
>
> Name: hasLicense****
>
> Type: ObjectProperty****
>
> Occurrence Constraint: optional****
>
> Category: Availability information****
>
> Definition: Underlying license model****
>
> Domain: omv:Ontology****
>
> Range: omv:LicenseModel****
>
> Cardinality: 0:1****
>
> OMV version: 0.1****
>
> Comments: Reference to a concrete LicenseModel Pre-defined values. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Individuals of the class LicenseModel refer to well-known license models,
> such as:****
>
> • Academic Free License (AFL)****
>
> • Common Public License (CPL)****
>
> • Lesser General Public License (LGPL)****
>
> • Open Software License (OSL)****
>
> • General Public License (GPL)****
>
> • Modified BSD License (mBSD)****
>
> • IBM Public License (IBM PL)****
>
> • Apple Public Source License (APSL)****
>
> • INTEL Open Source License (INTEL OSL)****
>
> • Mozilla Public License (MPL)****
>
> • Creative Commons Licenses (CCL)****
>
> – Attribution (by)****
>
> – Attribution-NoDerivs (by-nd)****
>
> – Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (by-nc-nd)****
>
> – Attribution-NonCommercial (by-nc)****
>
> – Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike (by-nc-sa)****
>
> – Attribution-ShareAlike (by-sa)****
>
> The class can be extended to support additional classifications. ****
>
> The OMV project is running. The latest release of the core has been stable
> for some time now.  However, if new requirements are derived from users
> feedback/requests, a new version of the core may evolve.  More recently,
> efforts have been in the definition of extensions.****
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
> Raul****
>