- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:42:23 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
>>> >>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once >>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C >>> VoID document) is widely adopted. >> >> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. > > Is it? Yes, I think that RFC5785 [1] can be considered a standard. Unless you want to suggest that RFCs are sorta not real standards :P Cheers, Michael [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785 -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 22 Jul 2011, at 15:39, Dave Reynolds wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> Frans, > > [snip] > >>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once >>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C >>> VoID document) is widely adopted. >> >> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard. > > Is it? > > There was me thinking it was a Interest Group Note. > > Is there a newer version than: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/ > > ? > > Dave > >
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 14:42:52 UTC