- From: valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:50:11 +0200
- To: Luigi Selmi <selmi_luigi@hotmail.com>
- Cc: valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 12:50:46 UTC
Yes, I know OMV. I was actually wondering what's the most used practice :-) Val On Jul 19, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Luigi Selmi wrote: > The CC license RDFS vocabulary (at the end of the page). > > Ciao > > Luigi > > > > > From: vpresutti@gmail.com > > Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:23:23 +0200 > > CC: vpresutti@gmail.com > > To: public-lod@w3.org > > Subject: Ontology license info > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I could not find any suggestion of good practices for attaching a license to an ontology. > > Of course one can report it on its documentation (for humans), but I was wondering if there is any diffuse practice for embedding this info in the ontology as a property value (for machine readability). > > > > Any suggestion? > > > > Thanks for the help > > Val
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 12:50:46 UTC