- From: Davide Palmisano <dpalmisano@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:30:48 +0100
- To: valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 11:31:44 UTC
I often used Description of a Project vocabulary[1]. It foresees descriptive properties for software licenses. cheers, Davide [1] http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:23 PM, valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I could not find any suggestion of good practices for attaching a license > to an ontology. > Of course one can report it on its documentation (for humans), but I was > wondering if there is any diffuse practice for embedding this info in the > ontology as a property value (for machine readability). > > Any suggestion? > > Thanks for the help > Val > -- Davide Palmisano http://davidepalmisano.com http://twitter.com/dpalmisano
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 11:31:44 UTC