- From: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 06:31:00 -0700
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Gregg- I think this is nicely done and a great contribution to Monday's call, but I have some comments on terminology as it relates to section 3.1. In item 2 of the numbered list in that section, the phrase "conceptional graph" appears; I assume that's a typo for the phrase "conceptual graph", which is used in items 7 and 9. That being said, I think the use of "conceptual graph" in this context is problematic; that term is traditionally used to refer to the formalism developed by John Sowa in his work on knowledge representation, and implies a great deal more than I think you intend here; see Berners-Lee's writing on the differences between the CG formalism and RDF at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CG.html. I would suggest replacing "conceptual graph" with "directed graph", which I believe communicates your intent precisely without any unintended KR baggage. - FWIW, BPA On Saturday, July 2, 2011, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: > In order to try to reach some common ground, I put together a JSON-LD requirements document [1]. My thought was that we could look at the items point by point for the monday conference call to see where we have common ground. > > I've doubtless left off some requirements that other's would like to see; if there's something you'd like to add let me know and I'll update the doc. > > Gregg > > [1] http://json-ld.org/requirements/latest/ > -- Bradley P. Allen http://bradleypallen.org
Received on Sunday, 3 July 2011 13:31:28 UTC